all in one news

ECP views Imran Khan to be liable, excludes him in Toshakhana reference

In a significant choice, the Political race Commission of Pakistan has excluded PTI Executive Imran Khan, viewing him to be entirelyblameworthy of not sharing subtleties of Toshakhana gifts and continues from their deal during his experience as state leader.

A five-part seat, headed by Boss Political race Chief Sikandar Ruler Raja, consistently voted down Khan under Article 63 (p) of the Constitution.

In the choice declared by the ECP, it has been said that Khan is presently not an individual from the Public Get together and that his reaction was “not right”.

As per the decision, Khan has been engaged with degenerate practices and his seat in the Public Gathering has been pronounced empty. The decision has required the commencement of lawful activity against Khan.

After the ECP governed Khan deceived authorities about presents he got while in power, his legal counselor Gohar Khan said Khan was precluded from campaigning for political position for a long time, AFP detailed.

“The ECP has announced Imran Khan was associated with degenerate practices,” said Gohar Khan after the decision, adding: “We will challenge it in the Islamabad high court at this moment.”

The ECP decision peruses as follows:

As a spin-off of our previously mentioned discoveries, realities accessible on record and saving in view the contention of learned counsel for parties thus, we are of the considered assessment that the Respondent has become excluded under Article 63(1)(p) of the Constitution read with Segment 137,167 and 173 of the Races Act, 2017, subsequently he fails to be an individual from the Public Gathering of Pakistan and his seat has become empty likewise.

As the respondent has offered misleading expressions and wrong announcements, in this way he has additionally dedicated the offense of degenerate practices characterized under Area 167 and 173 of the Races Act,2017, culpable under Segment 174 of the Decisions Act, 2017. Office is coordinated to start judicial procedures and to make a subsequent move under Segment 190(2) of the Races Act, 2017.


PTI to challenge ECP decision in court

Soon after the ECP decision was reported, the PTI said it will challenge the ruling against Imran Khan in the Toshakhana case in the Islamabad High Court (IHC).

PTI General Secretary Asad Umar, responding to the ECP choice, said that the party is moving toward the IHC today against the choice. “PTI will document a request today,” he said.

ECP choice assault on Pakistan foundations: Fawad Chaudhry

Then again, rankled over the ECP decision, senior PTI pioneer Fawad Chaudhry considered it a “disgraceful” choice which is an assault on the foundations of Pakistan.

Addressing media people after the decision, Chaudhry said that the commission had given the decision they had expected. “They are just focusing on Imran Khan,” he said.

The PTI pioneer said that the ECP and its individuals are not sufficiently equipped to pursue this choice. “Who are you [ECP] to take this choice?” he addressed.

“I request individuals from Pakistan to rampage for their privileges. PTI and the country reject this choice,” he added.

Found in the act’: Bilawal Bhutto

In the interim, PPP Director Bilawal Bhutto said that the Political decision Commission of Pakistan has viewed Imran Khan to be very muchblameworthy of degenerate practices and he presently stands excluded.

“He who might spread lies about the supposed debasement of his political adversaries has been discovered in the act,” Bilawal said.

Imran Khan has been precluded for quite a long time: regulation clergyman.

Government Regulation Priest Azam Nazeer Tarar affirmed that the ECP has precluded Imran Khan for a long time.

While holding a question and answer session in Islamabad, he said that Khan introduced mistaken realities before the Political race Commission. “The ECP has been cautious, generally one more move might have been initiated against Khan,” he said.

He said that Imran Khan’s partners are expressing that there has been an extraordinary unfairness. “Treachery happens when the law covers nothing,” he said.

‘Guaranteed liar’: Maryam Nawaz.

In addition, PML-N VP Maryam Nawaz requested Imran Khan be captured after he was seen as at legitimate fault for degenerate practices.

“Pakistan’s previously guaranteed liar and confirmed hoodlum precluded with obvious proof of burglary,” the PML-N pioneer said.

She affirmed that the couple together stole from the public kitty.





The Toshakhana reference petitioned for Imran’s preclusion was shipped off the ECP by Public Gathering Speaker Raja Pervaiz Ashraf on the solicitation of individuals from the decision alliance. They asserted in the reference that Imran Khan didn’t uncover the pay in his resources acquired by selling presents got from Toshakhana. The reference recorded under Article 63 of the Constitution looked for Imran Khan’s exclusion under Article 62-1(f).

The 28-page reference recognized 52 present things of Toshakhana got by the previous state leader Khan, disregarding the law and rules, removed at ostensible costs and a large portion of the gifts were sold on the lookout, including some valuable watches.

The surveyed worth of the gifts has been put at Rs142,042,100. The presents were gotten between August 2018 and December 2021.

As per PML-N MNA Ranjha, Khan covered data about the endowment of watches by Saudi Arabia’s Crown Sovereign Mohammad receptacle Salman in his explanation of resources submitted in 2018-2019.

This portion of data is equivalent to lying which, as per Ranjha, is a wrongdoing under Segment 137.

He accordingly said that Khan was no more Sadiq and Ameen and ought to be hit with exclusion for life from challenging the political decision under Article 62(1)(f), Article 2, Article 3 of the Constitution.

Article 62(1)(f) is the very lawful instrument that excluded previous PM Nawaz Sharif from challenging races and prompted his expulsion from power, Ranjha said.

What is the Toshakhana?

The “Toshakhana” is an administration office, which during the Mughal time alluded to the “treasuries” kept by the sub-mainland’s royal rulers to store and show gifts pampered on them.

Government authorities should pronounce all gifts, yet are permitted to keep those under a specific worth. More costly things should go to Toshakhana, however at times the beneficiary can repurchase them at around half of their worth – – a rebate Khan brought from 20% while up in office.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *